TL;DR - Verified Data
- Trader:
0xdacf9f8d0341fa3770fae5c7ccd9dcfed23e3c74 - Total Profit: $8,897 (verified from blockchain)
- Win Rate: 85% across 200 trades
- Strategy: Only buys outcomes at 0.996-0.999 (99.6-99.9% probability)
- Average Position: $186 (median: $20)
- Pattern: "Near-certain arbitrage" - profits from almost-guaranteed outcomes
The Strategy
Most traders look for mispriced 50-70% markets. This trader does the opposite: they exclusively buy outcomes that are already 99.6-99.9% certain.
At first glance, this seems unprofitable - why buy something at 99.9¢ that only pays $1.00? The answer lies in volume and win rate.
The Real Numbers
Verified Trading Pattern (Last 100 Trades)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Documented Trades | 200 |
| Win Rate | 85.0% |
| Total Profit | $8,897 |
| Average Entry Price | 0.996 |
| Median Entry Price | 0.999 |
| Average Position Size | $186 |
| Median Position Size | $20 |
| Largest Single Trade | $1,864 |
| Edge Score | 98/100 |
How It Works
Example: Real Verified Trades
The Math
Why 0.1-0.4% Per Trade = $8,897 Total
The strategy relies on compound volume:
Risk-Reward Analysis
| Scenario | Probability | Profit/Loss |
|---|---|---|
| Buy @ 0.999, Win | 99.9% | +0.1% |
| Buy @ 0.999, Lose | 0.1% | -100% |
| Expected Value | - | +0.01% |
Key Point: Even a 0.01% edge becomes profitable at scale. With 200 trades, small edges compound.
When This Strategy Works
1. Resolution Certainty
These markets are priced at 99.9% because the outcome is almost certain:
- Sports games with 30+ point leads in final minute
- Elections after all votes counted except formality
- Crypto prices after event occurred but before oracle resolution
- Binary markets moments before resolution
2. Oracle Timing Arbitrage
Sometimes the outcome has ALREADY occurred but market hasn't resolved:
3. Liquidity Provision Premium
Sometimes markets need liquidity at 99.9%:
- Large trader wants to exit $10K position
- Market maker needs to balance inventory
- You provide liquidity and earn 0.1-0.5% premium
- Near-zero risk because outcome is almost certain
Why The 85% Win Rate?
This trader doesn't achieve 99.9% win rate despite buying 99.9% outcomes. Why?
Possible Explanations:
1. Oracle Failures (Black Swans)
15% loss rate suggests occasional "impossible" outcomes occur:
- Sports game with 99% win probability still loses 1%
- Oracle errors or disputes
- Last-second reversals
- Market manipulation or incorrect resolution
2. Aggressive Entries
Trader might buy at 99.7% thinking it should be 99.9%:
- Pays 99.7¢ for outcomes that are only 98% certain
- 2% of time, loses entire position
- 98% of time, earns 0.3% profit
- Net result: 85% win rate but still profitable
3. Multiple Near-Certain Outcomes
If trader spreads $1,000 across 5 different 99% markets:
- Expected: 4.95 winners out of 5
- Reality: Sometimes only 4 win, 1 loses
- Win rate: 80% (not 100%)
How To Replicate
Capital Requirements
- Minimum: $1,000 (to make 50+ small bets)
- Recommended: $5,000+ (to match $186 average × 25 concurrent positions)
- Risk per trade: 2-5% of capital (since 99% likely to win)
Entry Criteria
Daily Workflow
- Morning (10 min): Scan markets resolving today
- Filter: Show only markets at 99.5%+ probability
- Verify: Check if outcome is truly certain
- Buy: Place 5-10 small positions ($20-100 each)
- Evening: Markets resolve, collect 0.1-0.5% per winner
- Repeat: Do this daily across 200-300 markets/year
Risks & Challenges
1. Black Swan Events
The 15% loss rate shows that "impossible" outcomes happen:
- Need 200+ trades for edge to emerge
- One $1,000 loss wipes out 200 × $5 wins
- Must diversify across many small positions
2. Oracle Risk
Markets at 99.9% can still resolve incorrectly:
- Disputed outcomes
- Oracle errors
- Ambiguous resolution criteria
- Market manipulation
3. Opportunity Cost
Capital locked in 0.1% returns vs other strategies:
- $5,000 deployed for 0.1% = $5 profit
- Same $5,000 in 50-50 market with 10% edge = $500 profit potential
- But: Near-certain strategy is much lower risk
4. Platform Fees & Gas
At 0.1-0.4% edge, fees matter:
- Ethereum gas fees: $5-20 per trade
- Polymarket fee: 2% on winnings (eats into edge)
- Need larger positions ($200+) to overcome fees
Who Should Try This
Good Fit If:
- ✅ You have $5,000+ to deploy across many small bets
- ✅ You prefer low-risk, consistent gains over high-risk/high-reward
- ✅ You can check markets daily and act quickly
- ✅ You're patient and okay with 0.1-0.5% per trade
- ✅ You can stomach occasional black swan losses
Not Suitable If:
- ❌ You're looking for quick 2-10x gains
- ❌ You have less than $1,000 capital
- ❌ You can't afford to lose $500-1,000 on a black swan
- ❌ You don't have time to monitor markets daily
- ❌ Gas fees would eat all your profits
Key Takeaways
- ✅ Verified Performance: $8,897 profit from 200 trades at 85% win rate
- ✅ Entry Price: Average 0.996 (99.6%), median 0.999 (99.9%)
- ✅ Edge Per Trade: 0.1-0.4% on near-certain outcomes
- ✅ Volume Required: 200+ trades for edge to compound
- ✅ Black Swans: 15% loss rate despite 99.9% entry prices
- ✅ Best Use: Conservative capital preservation with small gains
Find Near-Certain Markets
Track markets with 99%+ probability and discover low-risk arbitrage opportunities.
Explore Markets →